Esmeralda fell of her skateboard and needed help. she would be least likely to get immediate help if her accident happened at a busy interaction.
According to a social psychological hypothesis known as the "bystander effect" or "bystander apathy," people are less inclined to assist a victim when other people are around. Since it was first introduced in 1964, a great deal of study, primarily in the lab, has concentrated on a wide range of topics, including the number of bystanders, ambiguity, group cohesion, and the dispersion of blame that supports mutual denial. However, if a group is required to complete the task, each member will have a weak sense of responsibility and will frequently shrink back in the face of difficulties or responsibilities. If a single individual is asked to complete the task alone, the sense of responsibility will be strong, and there will be a positive response.
To learn more about bystander effect click here:
brainly.com/question/3156006
#SPJ9
Post-communist reforms in many Central European countries, particularly Romania and Bulgaria, have been hampered by the persistence of corruption and organized crime.
Post-communist reforms:
The WIDER group evaluated the four fundamental pillars of a successful transition in Eastern Europe—stabilization, price liberalization, privatization, and restructuring—in their prior report, Post-communist Reform in Eastern Europe. This elite group of economists has been actively participating in the reform process for the past three years. In this new research, they take stock, revisit the key ideas, and evaluate the state of play, notably in Russia.
The major Central European nations were stabilized mostly according to plan. In contrast, Russia is moving along a path of a reorganization rather than stabilization. The writers discuss the potential success of this alternate approach. Regarding privatization, they point out that earlier strategies were based on the supposition that the resources belonged to the government. as sluggish development.
Learn more about Post-communist here:
brainly.com/question/24232974
#SPJ4
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
Answer:Page, squire, knight
C
Explanation:
Answer:d. the duty of performance
Explanation:
The duty of performance means you perform the duty that you have promised on a contract that you will perform. The contract is fulfilled only when the two parties have performed their stipulated duties according to the contract.
Custom Floral Arrangements, Inc., hires Bernard to order exotic flowers for its arrangements; they did this because Bernard is an expert on exotic flowers hence they trusted and mostly likely agreed on the contract that he will indeed do his duty to examine that the flowers are indeed perfectly exotic as an expert.
Bernard does not examine the quality of the flowers he orders on behalf of Custom Floral, this is a breach of contract because now he is not performing the duty that they hired him to perform.
