Answer:
x>9 and x<11
Step-by-step explanation:
Take a look at the picture and note that the same tick marks represent that they are congruent parts.
A. UV is parallel to JL. Yes, this is correct. They are parallel because they don't intersect at any point.
B. UW = 12KL. This is incorrect. The truth is, UW = (1/2)(KL). If this is a typo error and there should've been a '/' in between 1 and 2, then this is acceptable.
C. UW = VW. As you can see, UKVW is a rectangle. They have two pairs of congruent sides. And UW≠VW, so this is incorrect.
D. UV = UK. The diagonal of a rectangle is never equal with one of its sides. So, this is incorrect.
E. JK = 2VW. Since VW=UK and we can see that twice the length of UK is equal to JK, then this is correct.
If it’s not graded does it really matter but it’s 4042 I think
<span>y=-3x-4
slope = 3
perpendicular to line then slope = 1/3
answer
</span>slope of a line perpendicular to <span>y=-3x-4
</span><span>=
1/3
</span>
Any multiple of (-2x+3y=18) would constitute an "other equation" forming a system with an infiinite number of solutions. The reason for that is that the two equations would be "dependent."
On the other hand, looking at the system
<span>-2x+ 3y= 18
</span><span>-2x+ 3y= 19
we see that there is no solution. Why? Because -2x + 3y cannot equal 18 and 19 at the same time. You'd have two non-intersecting, parallel lines.
</span>
