Czars are like Russian kings
Answer:Public policy describes the actions of government. Usually created in response to issues brought before decision makers, these policies come in the form of laws and regulations. They may be created by any governing body, from the U.S. president down to city council members.
Explanation:
The answer is "Both were attempts to show that segregation was unconstitutional." Brewer took no part in the thought or choice of the case. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896) was a point of interest protected law instance of the US Supreme Court. It maintained state racial isolation laws for open offices under the teaching of "particular however equivalent".
Answer;
C. <span>Imperialists use civilization as an excuse to take advantage of people.
Explanation;
</span><span>In his "To the Person Sitting In Darkness" Twain is showing the immoral path America has set itself on by trying to establish an empire similar to those of European governments of the time. He despises the path of brutality and inhumanity that the Americans have set for themselves as their nations policy in dealing with inferior races both in their own country and also China and the Philippines also disparages the role of churches and their missionaries in the spread of the American dream in foreign countries on the pretext of spreading the Christian religion.</span>
Answer: Populism from the Latin word "Populus," which in translation would mean the people.
Explanation:
Similar to the notion of democracy, populism implies a rule that is in the service of the people. It is the opposite of government, which includes in its interest group a small group of people whose interests are defended, which is the case with aristocracy and plutocracy. And if they are similar synonyms, democracy today implies positive connotations in public, while populism is taken in the context of the negative.
This is because the strategy of populism is based on using the sensibilities of society, their essential life issues for political purposes. For example, it is possible to take two groups, which are separated by different antagonisms. On the one hand, it is an ordinary people and on the other a corrupt elite who argue that politics should be an expression of the will of the people