1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arlik [135]
3 years ago
15

What is the main argument of the paragraphs that list King George’s wrongs? How do the King’s wrongs connect to the colonists’ r

ight to rebel against him? please dont answer straight from g0gle (I've already tried and it doesn't give a direct answer) or give unfinished answers
History
1 answer:
Hunter-Best [27]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The main "argument" is that King George has repeatedly infringed on the colonies and their governments. Each charge against King George is an example of how he has infringed on colonists' life, liberty, and property (the three rights guaranteed to individuals according to political philosopher John Locke) and how he has attempted to supersede their own colonial governments' authority.

This connects to another idea introduced by Locke, the right to rebel. Basically, if a government is not representing the people, if a government is oppressing the people, then the people have the right to overthrow that tyrannical government and institute a new one.

So essentially, the colonists are listing all the wrongs that King George has committed to show him that, in their eyes, he is a tyrannical leader who has oppressed the people and they are communicating to him that because of this, they are rebelling and instituting a new government.

You might be interested in
What was the Marshall Plan?
STALIN [3.7K]
In general terms, the Marshall Plan was "<span>b. a program to aid European nations and to promote prosperity and democracy," since it was believed that this would help stop the spread of communism. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two of the following represent the ideals the Republican and Democratic parties agreed on?​
yKpoI14uk [10]

The ideals that the Democratic and the republican parties agreed on are

  • Social liberty
  • Social equality.

<h3>What is social liberty?</h3>

This is a term that is used to refer to the freedom of the members of the United States. The term agrees upon the fact that citizens were free people.

<h3>What is social equality?</h3>

This term refers to the fact that all members of the country are equal and they all deserved to have the same opportunities in the nation.

Read more on the Republican and Democratic parties  here: brainly.com/question/14869581

5 0
3 years ago
Which belief is shared by Jews Christians and Muslims?
gulaghasi [49]
Abrahamic religions. The abrahamic religions are monotheistic
4 0
3 years ago
Why did the founding fathers create a way to amend the constitution?
11111nata11111 [884]
Essentially, because they knew they were human and could easily make mistakes that would take a long time to show. Additionally, they wanted future generations to be able to change the Constitution if the government started abusing it. Both of these problems are covered in the amendment process.
7 0
3 years ago
Who’s the 24th president??
Snezhnost [94]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its Grover Cleveland Hope this helps you :)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the enemy of the French Revolution
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes an effect of nationalism on European colonies during the 19th century?
    11·2 answers
  • Can somebody help like quick ??
    5·1 answer
  • How has incorporation allowed the supreme court to the rule on state laws
    11·2 answers
  • When a case goes to trial, which of the following would be in line with the Rule of Law?
    14·2 answers
  • !!HELP TIMED QUIZ!!
    7·2 answers
  • I need help plz help me
    6·1 answer
  • ANSWER ASAP
    13·1 answer
  • What is depicted in the Triumph of Death, seen above? a. A depiction of the effects of the Black Plague b. Figures overcoming th
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe arguments made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!