One of the main differences of interpretation between Charles Beard and Carol Berkin is their point of view on the Constitution and the founding fathers.
Charles Beard is the author of An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. In this work published in 1913, the author argued that the Constitution of the United States was formulated to serve the interests of wealthy members of the upper class of society.
One of his most controversial statements is his claim about the Founding Fathers, whom he points out as belonging to the upper-class group and who wrote the Constitution to defend their rights and interests.
On the other hand, Carol Berkin is the author of the book The Bill of Rights: The Fight to Secure America's Liberties, published in 2015. In this book, she exposes her interpretation of the process of creation of the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights.
Her interpretation of these historical events is framed in a vision of the founding fathers as mere mortals who ignored the possibility that the new government they were building would last for many years.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that Carol Berkin and Charles Beard have different views of the Constitution and the founding fathers such as:
- Charles considers that they wrote the constitution for their convenience.
- Carol describes them as ordinary people who wanted to change their situation and establish a government for all.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1992478
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, this question is incomplete because does not include the policies it is referring to. However, we can comment on the following.
Indeed, there have to be policies aimed to control the growth of the population. Otherwise, the federal government could not keep track of the natalities on a monthly and yearly basis. This control is needed because the government has to be aware of the impact of the number of newborns on public services.
However, all the controls instilled by the government have to be reasonable and respect the human rights of the parents. Nothing has to be imposed that does not respect their rights.
The government expects that parents can be responsible enough to bring the number of children they can take care of. To not compromise the health service industry and the public education system, and other public services.
Answer:
regional governments are weak
Explanation:
A unitary style of government is defined as the government that follow highest degree of centralization and central/national government holds all the power.
Regional governments are weak in unitary system and are responsible only to implement the policies made by the central/national government.
Hence, the correct answer is "regional governments are weak".
They might not agree with the idea to take natural rights away because there natural the government or nobody can do that
