1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elodia [21]
3 years ago
15

History books don't tell the whole truth​

History
2 answers:
cupoosta [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

of what we don't know what you're trying to say

beks73 [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:lol

Explanation:lol

You might be interested in
Read the excerpt from the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
gregori [183]
The answer is <span>"was the first time the Constitution defined what a citizen is"</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Using the map above, what number is on the state with the capital city of raleigh
uysha [10]

Raleigh is the capital of North Carolina, therefore North Carolina is number 12.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pasha's were rulers of colonial provinces in Arabia. True or False
astraxan [27]
The answer is true to this quesiom
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Do you agree with the two parties system? Why or why not? 2. Should the third parties in the United States get more support?
3241004551 [841]

Answer:

Personally, I agree with the existence of a two-party system in American politics, since I believe that from this system, the liberal and conservative currents of the nation are framed in one or another party, thus avoiding fragmentation of the different positions politics in minority parties, or that political parties of extremist dyes are generated that can damage the democracy of the nation.

Even so, I consider that certain specific issues defended by third parties should be heard and defended by the majority parties, which is why I support the existence of third parties only for the purposes of expressing specific cases (such as environmental rights, animal rights, etc. ) but not for the purposes of real competition in national politics.

8 0
2 years ago
Why do historians consider political cartoons to be credible sources in historical inquiry
NeX [460]
Historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in the historical inquiry because they <span>are drawn by people who have an opinion about the event. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "b". I hope the answer has helped you.


</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The discovery of the mummies in Xinjiang sparked debate because:
    10·1 answer
  • What were the social classes during the elizabethan era?
    10·1 answer
  • Which was true about the economy when franklin roosevelt campaigned for president?
    14·2 answers
  • What was one major reason that napoleon bonaparte, the leader of france, wanted to sell louisiana? napoleon didn't care about ex
    9·1 answer
  • Mark the statement if it describes the Roman Empire at its height. A. The empire stretched from Spain to Assyria and from North
    14·2 answers
  • 1. The two major river systems of China are the<br>and the​
    5·2 answers
  • The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments did not give Native Americans the right to vote. True False
    10·2 answers
  • Help me out please??????
    9·1 answer
  • 5. Why was the election of 1800 so important?​
    15·1 answer
  • What impact did roman mythology have on western civilization?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!