1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikitadnepr [17]
4 years ago
5

Why did Texas suffer see's from the war than other areas of the South?

History
1 answer:
Sati [7]4 years ago
8 0
In the Civil War, Texas (young Texas) served as a support state, and there was barely any skrimishes in the state. Technically, by the governor's word (The governor at the time was Sam Houston), Texas was originally pro-Union, but the citizens wantes war as a way to assert the state's rights. Also, Texas did not fight for wealthy plantation owners in other states;<u> </u><u>Texas didn't have any cotton plantations compared to the other Southern states, so they didn't suffer as bad as a loss than the other states</u><span>. Moreover, during the battles outside of the state, the Texan soldiers either deserted from warfare or joined the Union.</span>
You might be interested in
Can someone help me please
katrin2010 [14]

Answer:

it's B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS HELP Why was the Opium War significant for Britain?
Annette [7]

Answer:

A I believe hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The young men called to fight in 1914 were enthusiastic? True or false ?
NemiM [27]

Answer:

True allot were happy to get away from home

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
A problem that free African Americans faced in the North was
Sonbull [250]
Racial Discrimination mainly displayed by the KKK. Another Challenge that free blacks faced was finding a living in the still very racist america. Also the search for work. There were racial limitations. 

-hope this helps :)
7 0
3 years ago
The Supreme Court's ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case declared which of the
andriy [413]

Answer:

Missouri Comp.

Explanation:

Scott v. Sandford declared that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional meaning that congress had no power over slavery

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Compare the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists by making two separate lists of their main arguments. Identify at least three a
    6·1 answer
  • How did Julius Caesar help turn the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did the Renaissance begin in northern Italy?
    10·2 answers
  • On January 1863, President Lincoln declared that all slaves in the Confederacy "shall be then
    13·2 answers
  • What are non examples of direct democracy
    15·1 answer
  • In the Philippines, how did the civil societies contribute to its political, economic and social development?
    12·1 answer
  • Who did Sparta ask for money
    14·1 answer
  • As strong supporters of states' rights, officials in state governments in the South believed that the national government had no
    6·2 answers
  • What is the final step for a bill to become a law?
    13·2 answers
  • Which u. S. Army general became the first commander-in-chief of the united states european command in 1952?.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!