221 B.C., the Qin ruler Shi Huangdi unified China and ruled by harsh Legalist principles. The Han Dynasty ruled over a large and successful land. The Han Chinese way of life is reflected in Chinese life today. Strong government remains important in Chinese life today. the mid 19th century. The politicization of the field under the concept of racism in the 20th century led to a decline in racial studies during the 1930s to 1980s, culminating in a poststructuralist deconstruction of race as a social construct.
Canning or home canning is preserving fruits and vegetables at home in jars with lids that seal to keep them fresh.
Answer:
Mercantilism
Explanation:
Mercantilism, an economic policy designed to increase a nation's wealth through exports, thrived in Great Britain between the 16th and 18th centuries. Between 1640-1660, Great Britain enjoyed the greatest benefits of mercantilism.
hope it helps ☺️!
<span>One sort of confirmation that backings Wegener's theory is that fossils of a similar life form have been found on various mainlands. Since Wegener couldn't recognize the reason for mainland float, most geologists rejected his thought. Figure 13Alfred Wegener Although researchers dismisses his hypothesis, Wegener kept on gathering confirmation of mainland float and to refresh his book.</span>
Answer:
Because of John Marshall, the Supreme Court can review the constitutionality of federal laws that allegedly contradict the Constitution of the United States. This arises from the ruling in Marbury v. Madison, written by Chief Justice Marshall.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison is the most significant precedent of the Supreme Court, which gave the power to oversee the constitutionality of laws, as well as to protect the human rights and freedoms of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution.
In this matter, the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is established in cases where there are differing opinions of appellate courts, when a federal law is being evaluated, and especially when a constitutional issue is raised.
In this way, this ruling modified the system of "checks and balances", allowing the federal judiciary to control legislative and executive power in certain cases. This specific power of the judiciary is not enshrined in the Constitution, but has been put into practice through judicial review. It implies the right of courts to declare invalid and to repeal acts of executive and legislative power (both of the President and of Congress) which are considered contrary to the Constitution. The Supreme Court, through judicial review, cannot amend the Constitution, but can only interpret and apply it in a manner it deems appropriate.
