Answer:
Both are professional titles acquired through specific schooling and a licensing process.
With regards to the building industry, an architect is the generalist and an engineer is the specialist. Generally, the architect is the conceptual designer of the project, involved through all stages of a project. Engineers come and go (some stay significantly longer than others) and focus on a specific aspect of a building such as the mechanical systems or the structure. Architects and engineers together make up "the design team," and they work together to make the design complete. Architectural elements may be moved for the structure to make more sense and vice versa. The architect is usually the overseer, communicating with all the disciplines involved. The architect is likely the first to notice that the proposed ductwork conflicts with a structural beam, for example.
If the project is large enough, you might have two sets of architect teams: the design architect and the executive architect, also known as the Architect of Record. The executive architect has a more technical focus.
The technical aspects of architecture include compliance with building codes and figuring out all the building stuff related to the final product. For example, a plumbing engineer's drawing will have a line on a drawing representing a plumbing line. An architect's drawing might include a detail that shows that plumbing line as an actual pipe with a thickness with the bricks and cement block of the wall it is penetrating as well as whatever seal will be keeping the rain out.
Because of the difference in role and scope between an architect and engineer, the engineer of a project will be working on many other projects simultaneously, while the architect is dedicated to a few or just the one.
Explanation:
Your answer is is simply <span>Piaget</span>
European establishment of trading posts in Asia and Africa affect politics in these regions (1450-1750) in that the establishment of new trading-post empires by the Europeans in Africa and Asia was advantageous for the kings and traders who participated in the emerging global trade networks, but these empires also had an impact on the strength of the governments in interior West and Central Africa.
<h3>What was the effect of the trading post about?</h3>
While other foods were introduced to the Americas by African slaves, Europeans brought fruit trees, wheat, sugar, and domesticated animals (horses, cattle, and pigs okra, rice)
The introduction of European agriculture and settlement methods to the Americas during the period of European colonization frequently resulted in soil depletion and deforestation, which had an impact on the physical environment. Funding for the visual and performing arts, even for popular audiences, surged along with an increase in literacy and an increased emphasis on innovation and scientific investigation as merchant profits rose and governments raked in more taxes.
Slavery in Africa kept on the practice of both exporting slaves to the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean in addition to continuing the customary practice of integrating mostly female slaves into families.
Therefore, Royally incorporated European monopoly firms and the flow of silver from the Spanish colonies in the Americas to buy Asian items for the Atlantic markets helped to promote the new global circulation of goods. Regional markets kept expanding thanks to established business methods and fresh, transoceanic shipping services created by European merchants.
Learn more about trading posts from
brainly.com/question/734568
#SPJ1
