Answer:
Job Sharing.
Explanation:
Job sharing can be understood as an act, where one set of employees works for a given shift and the remaining work is completed by the other set of employees at any other time of the day. This is usually done by part-time workers and they tend to split their remuneration as well according to the work requirement and their performance.
Answer:
The firm willing to pay a worker chosen at random an amount of $38,000.
Explanation:
This can be calculated as follows:
Amount the firm is willing to pay = (40% × $50,000) + (60% × $30,000) = $20,000 + $18,000 = $38,000.
Therefore, the firm is willing to pay a worker chosen at random an amount of $38,000.
In 2007, Petra spent <u>$2,340</u> on wages for her employees each week, and Petra increased her annual wage budget from 2008 by <u>$14,56</u>0.
<h3>
Calculation of wages</h3>
Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:
Petra owns a coffee shop. She has ten employees. In 2007, she paid her employees minimum wage ($5.85 an hour). In 2008, the minimum wage increased to $6.55 an hour. In 2009, the minimum wage increased to $7.25 an hour. Petra is paying her ten employees for 40 hours a week 52 weeks each year. In 2007 Petra spent___ on wages for her employees each week. When the minimum wage rose in 2009, Petra had to increase her annual budget for wage from 2008 by___
We can now proceed as follows:
Weekly wage spent Petra in 2007 = 2007 minimum wage per hour * Number of employees * Number of hours per week = $5.85 * 10 * 40 = $2,340
Amount of increase in minimum wage per hour between 2008 and 2009 = $7.25 - 6.55 = $0.7/hour
Petra’s increase in annual budget for wages in 2009 = Amount of increase in minimum wage per hour between 2008 and 2009 * Number of employees * Number of hours per week * Number of weeks = $0.7 * 10 * 40 * 52 = $14,560
Learn more about wages here: brainly.com/question/15381069.
#SPJ4
Answer:
LIFO
Explanation:
It will be the one that give higher Cost of goods sold. We also know that:
Cost of goods sold = Opening Inventory + Inventory Purchases - Closing Inventory
So this means the lower the closing inventory the higher the cost of goods sold and in time of price increases it will be more appropriate to use LIFO method which will reduce the Closing Inventory and this will increase the cost of goods sold and thus decrease in profit. This reduced profit means that the tax expense will also be lower in value.
Similarly the second attractive option will be the Weighted Average and the least attractive option would be FIFO costing method.
