The answer, I believe, is A. Class Conflict.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Conscientiousness.
Explanation:
Conscientiousness is one of the five dimensions of personality described in the Big Five model of personality.
People that are highly conscientious are very dependable, reliable, responsible and punctual. They take promises very seriously and are usually very strict and reliable in their behavior.
On the other hand, people that score low on conscientiousness are typically unreliable, are more prone to irresponsible behavior and tend to be lazy and avoid commitment.
In this particular example, Layne exhibits low levels of Conscientiousness.
Answer:
Territories obtained in the Mexican American War of 1848 caused further sectional strife over the expansion of slavery in the ante bellum period. ... The ideological seeds of the American Civil War, in turn, were sown during that conflict.
Explanation: