In the given statement above, in this case, the answer would be TRUE. It is true that the inequality x + 2y ≥ 3 is satisfied by point (1, 1). In order to prove this, we just have to plug in the values. 1 + 2(1) <span> ≥ 3
So the result is 1 + 2 </span> ≥ 3. 3 <span> ≥ 3, which makes it true, because it states that it is "more than or equal to", therefore, our answer is true. Hope this answer helps.</span>
Given
Present investment, P = 22000
APR, r = 0.0525
compounding time = 10 years
Future amount, A
A. compounded annually
n=10*1=10
i=r=0.0525
A=P(1+i)^n
=22000(1+0.0525)^10
=36698.11
B. compounded quarterly
n=10*4=40
i=r/4=0.0525/4
A=P(1+i)^n
=22000*(1+0.0525/4)^40
=37063.29
Therefore, by compounding quarterly, she will get, at the end of 10 years investment, an additional amount of
37063.29-36698.11
=$365.18
Answer: they are abt the same its all abt percentage now- Pitcher A
Step-by-step explanation: more water lessens the strength