1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
3 years ago
6

How would América be different if the foundational documents never existed

History
1 answer:
Harrizon [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I'm not sure if this helps but colonists would have had to fight for their rights.

The Declaration was a justification that the US could be independent.

You might be interested in
After the war many Americans who fought in the revolutionary war:
andrey2020 [161]
Focused on private rather than public affairs
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following issues did President Johnson NOT attempt to focus on during his Presidency?
erica [24]
Wheres the following ..................
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
Why was Winston Churchill a great leader
matrenka [14]
Churchill was an effective leader and statesman because of his tremendous ability to inspire people; his unique strategic insight; his relentless passion; and his imperturbable personality.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is land so important in China?
Sonbull [250]
For agriculture,and China people really favour rice,so if there is no land,there wouldn't be an exact place for them to plant for production of rice.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When king Menes United the kingdoms of upper and lower Egypt by establishing a succession of rulers from the same family he foun
    6·1 answer
  • In the 1840 president james k polk belief in manofest destiny led to
    8·1 answer
  • This is a civil rights organization that was instrumental in the 60s civil rights movement. Martin luther king was its first pre
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement would most likely be supported by someone who agrees with socialist philosophy
    15·2 answers
  • Jackson's unofficial cabinet became known as the "kitchen cabinet."<br> a. True<br> b. False
    5·1 answer
  • What was a key cause for the rise of fascism in
    13·2 answers
  • What is the right to travel freely between states?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Battle of Britain?
    14·2 answers
  • According to this information (keeping in mind that in 1824 a candidate had to win 131 electoral votes in order to win the elect
    14·1 answer
  • How do the quotation from Mary Tsukamoto, the photos, and the excerpt from Executive Order 9066 contrast with traditional Americ
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!