1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following leaders was victorious in the fall of Constantinople?

History
2 answers:
slava [35]3 years ago
8 0
The victorious leader was Mehmet II he was the sultan of the Ottomans
olasank [31]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is mehmet II
You might be interested in
Where was franklin d Roosevelt during world war 2<br> [what state was he in]
blondinia [14]

Answer:

Franklin D. Roosevelt was in his second term as governor of New York when he was elected as the nation’s 32nd president in 1932.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was a consequence of the first continental congress
Rus_ich [418]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the delegates decided to submit an official statement of grievances against the British Crown for the passage of the Intolerable Acts, which were despised in the colonies.</span></span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the industrial revolution effect economics
vredina [299]
It made you able to mass produce products witch made more jobs for people
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was John Locke? Describe what he did that changed everything.
Viktor [21]

John Locke was among the most famous philosophers and political theorists of the 17th century.  He is often regarded as the founder of a school of thought known as British Empiricism, and he made foundational contributions to modern theories of limited, liberal government. He was also influential in the areas of theology, religious toleration, and educational theory. In his most important work, the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Locke set out to offer an analysis of the human mind and its acquisition of knowledge. He offered an empiricist theory according to which we acquire ideas through our experience of the world. The mind is then able to examine, compare, and combine these ideas in numerous different ways. Knowledge consists of a special kind of relationship between different ideas. Locke’s emphasis on the philosophical examination of the human mind as a preliminary to the philosophical investigation of the world and its contents represented a new approach to philosophy, one which quickly gained a number of converts, especially in Great Britain. In addition to this broader project, the Essay contains a series of more focused discussions on important, and widely divergent, philosophical themes. In politics, Locke is best known as a proponent of limited government. He uses a theory of natural rights to argue that governments have obligations to their citizens, have only limited powers over their citizens, and can ultimately be overthrown by citizens under certain circumstances. He also provided powerful arguments in favor of religious toleration. This article attempts to give a broad overview of all key areas of Locke’s thought.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does Wilson think that the constitution will work ?
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me! Before reaching modern-day Kenya, da Gama sailed between the mainland and an island off the southeast coast of A
    7·1 answer
  • All of the following have been a part of the Green party’s platform EXCEPT:
    11·1 answer
  • What was the name of the celtic new year that we now associated with halloween
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a direct result of United States involvement in World War 2?
    12·2 answers
  • Compare the lifestyle of hunter-gathers with those settlers of agricultural communities
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement is TRUE of American foreign policy under Presidents Harding and Coolidge?
    5·1 answer
  • What were the causes of capitalism?​
    7·1 answer
  • What is hagiography ???​
    5·2 answers
  • The competition between Catholic Spain and other European countries, such as England, the Netherlands, and even France, was part
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!