Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.
Answer:
To think for themselves and challenge authority
Explanation:
I hope this helps
Answer:
The states' rights debate of the early and mid-1800's were about a conflict between the idea of federalism and sectionalism.
