Answer:lament for the loss of innocence
Explanation:
Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
Answer:
who?
Explanation:
im trying to make a big you tube channel can you subscribe you dont have to https://www.you tube.com/channel/UCMSNELbyTgTnKpjl98scDig
^
remove space
tell me suggestions on what to do to improve
B. It too suggests she may want to get to know them as she is inviting them into her garden
<span>it is 20254 because you times both together<span><span><span><span><span>
</span></span></span></span></span></span>
