Answer: 1) they believed that Hitler is someone they can negotiate with, i.e. that he will keep his word or the treaties he signed, 2) France was afraid of German expansionism and at the same time there was quite powerful French extreme-right (fascist) sympathizing with Hitler, 3) British policy of appeasement (conservative party which also partly sympathized with him), 4) they believed that satisfying Hitlers will resolve the tension in Europe, 5) they believed they could take advantage of him in their favour.
Explanation: Hitler´s political style was totally outside the box, absolutely unprecedented so his actions and strategies were totally unpredictible event though all that Hitler had described in his book "Mein Kampf".
Answer:
Popular sovereignty is a doctrine in political theory that government is created by and subject to the will of the people.
popular sovereignty provided politicians with a convenient way to circumvent the slavery debate, maintain party unity, and promote sectional harmony.
Explanation:
The best answer for this question would be:
<span>A.
</span>Egypt conquered lands and formed a colony.
This colony led to the development of the Kingdom of Kush,
although this kingdom would only have lasted for less than a century because of
the expansion of the Neo-Assyrian empire in Egypt. The people of Kush continued
to survive later on in Nubia.
Answer:
C. A country adopts the constitution that divides its government into branches of equal power.
Explanation:
Montesquieu was a french philosopher who contributed to the political theory with his work Spirit of Laws. He wrote about the tripartite system in which the power should be divided among the legislature, executive and judiciary. He supported a form of government which was not centralised. His model was based on the British constitutional system and the constitution of Roman republic. He argued that during the Roman Republic the powers were separated to prevent any one person from taking over the government. He emphasised that judiciary should be really independent because it is the most important of other two.
Answer:
What are “nationwide injunctions”? When and why are they issued by federal courts? Have they been invoked more frequently in recent years, and, if so, how is that affecting how laws or executive orders are implemented nationwide? And is the term “nationwide injunctions” itself actually a misnomer? Two experts on these broad kinds of injunctions, Amanda Frost of American University’s Washington College of Law and Howard Wasserman of Florida International University, answer those questions. They also detail how nationwide injunctions have been used to block policies of both President Obama and President Trump – including immigration policies like DAPA and DACA under President Obama, and the so-called “travel ban” and third country asylum rule under President Trump – as well as civil rights policies like President Obama’s protections for transgender students using bathrooms that match their identities and President Trump’s ban on people with gender dysphoria serving in the military.
