Answer:
B) Top-down design
Explanation:
When someone carries out a top-down design, he/she is dividing a complex system in smaller parts in order to understand how each part works and how they work with other parts or sub-systems. A top-down approach basically starts at large and then breaks down the system into smaller and more manageable parts.
The result of this mistake on the order form is that Khan's Crickets should verify from Camille the actual order amount intended.
We may factor in the fact that the number of crickets will show the correct quantity that Camille requires, then Khan should supply only the quantity on the order form and request for a corrected or revised order form from Camille.
Thus, the result is that Khan's Crickets will still supply crickets with an invoice worth $1,000, not adhering to the mistaken total sum.
Related link for similar mistake on order form at brainly.com/question/17251413
Answer: The correct answer is "b. The investor should use the equity method to account for its investment unless circumstancesindicate that it is unable to exercise "significant influence" over the investee."
Explanation: When a company holds between 20% and 50% of the outstanding stock of an investee, the investor should use the equity method to account for its investment unless circumstancesindicate that it is unable to exercise "significant influence" over the investee.
If the company owns between 20% and 50% of the shares in circulation of the controlled company, it can be considered that the company that owns the shares exerts significant influence on the controlled company, in this case if the opposite is not proven, You must apply the equity method.
Base on research and further investigation, the positive linear transformation of leaf, and the move choices remains unchanged in a game tree with chance nodes is x to ax+b where as a is greater that 0. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for if you have questions and further clarifications
Answer:
The cash flow effect of Acadia’s restructuring during fiscal 2017 was $205899
Explanation:
cash flow effect = $235,542 - $29643
= $205899
Therefore, The cash flow effect of Acadia’s restructuring during fiscal 2017 was $205899.
