1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mylen [45]
3 years ago
10

During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was u

nfairly prejudicial. Emerly wants to appeal the court's decision. Which of the following is most likely true?
Law
1 answer:
natima [27]3 years ago
4 0
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was unfairly prejudicial. ... If an appeals court finds that the evidence against Emerly should have been excluded, she can receive a new trial.





Hope this helps
You might be interested in
What might a national fingerprint database not meet current law enforcement needs and be considered outdated?
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

this is your answer....

5 0
3 years ago
Civil cases may be handled at the federal level if the two parties are from different states and the disputed amount is above a
Lisa [10]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

only ones are civil and bankrupsy cases

5 0
2 years ago
Deducciones autorizadas por la ley
Vadim26 [7]
Esas tienes que buscarlas en línea para estar más segura obvisss
4 0
3 years ago
Why did the Supreme Court find their suspension unconstitutional?
mr Goodwill [35]

Because the armbands were deemed "Pure Speech," the Supreme Court ruled that their suspension is unconstitutional. The armbands had no negative effects on academic performance.

When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional matter, that decision is essentially definitive; only the constitutional amendment process or a subsequent judgment by the Court may overturn the Court's rulings. However, fresh legislative action may be done in response to the Court's interpretation of legislation.

Legislation, method, or action is unconstitutional if it directly contravenes the constitution. Unless the nation in issue has a system in place for challenging laws as being unconstitutional, all others are regarded as constitutional.

To learn more about Supreme Court

brainly.com/question/10739091

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
HELP ME
makkiz [27]

Answer:Fedral court federal courts only hear: Cases in which the United States is a party; Cases involving violations of the U.S. Constitution or federal laws (under federal-question jurisdiction); Cases between citizens of different states if the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 (under diversity jurisdiction); and.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Larissa is a student at a local college majoring in computer information technology. In order to pay her college tuition Larissa
    7·1 answer
  • 4. A new agent capable of infecting mammals, birds, and certain insects has been found in approximately
    7·2 answers
  • Who is the commander in chief of the<br> U.S. military forces?
    15·1 answer
  • 5) Specifically refers to an individual who was not directly impacted by a crime but was
    14·1 answer
  • The reasonable suspicion law derived from The Terry Vs Ohio Supreme Court ruling ?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following individual is NOT considered a U.S. citizen?
    12·1 answer
  • Not having traffic laws enforced and in place would result in
    13·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
    15·1 answer
  • When asked about the possible motive for a homicide, an innocent person would most likely
    6·1 answer
  • Analysis the motives that might cause a person to safe rather than to spend
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!