Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer:
no
Explanation:
The president should be able to do that because if he didn't our world today would be so messed up. We wouldn't have any laws. Also that is not too much power.
The answer is A. The preamble to the second amendment.
Answer:
a week
Explanation:
all this week is Thanksgiving break
Answer:
State law standard.
In a diversity case, federal trial courts are required to apply a <em>state law standard</em> when considering a motion for a new trial based on the excessiveness of the verdict.
<h3><em>
I hope this helped at all.</em></h3>
