Answer:
The correct option is the statement that reads " If a firm commits to making its environment a good place to work,workers will not leave"
Explanation:
The most qualified employees are always been poached because of the value they add to any organization,hence the first statement is absolute truth.
The second statement is wrong because there the best working environment cannot stop people from resigning,what in case someone needs to study masters abroad?
A certain level of turnover is healthy since it paves from for new hands with fresh perspective to be hired.
However, when turnovers becomes excessive,it implies a fundamental problem with the workplace.
Answer:
There could be a customer with the same name or surname. It could cause a mess in your database if the customer wants payback for something and there will be the customer with the same name. I think that the primary key should be consisted of unique Customer's ID number.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/2870954#readmore
Explanation:
Asked on brainley already
Answer:
The c orrect answer is A.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Annual deposit= 1,410
Annual interest rate= 5%
Number of years= 8 years
To calculate the future value of her investment, we need to use the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {1,410*[(1.05^8)-1]}/ 0.05
FV= $13,464.24
Yes , Judy and Kristy have an enforceable binding contract
Explanation:
Kristy Johnston, Judy Olsen, and Joyce Johnston, their mother, owned real estate as common buyers. After Joyce died, she left Kristy her one-third share in the house. Kristy sent Judy a letter in 2009 promising Judy to purchase or sell Judy's share in the property.
Judy accepted the sale bid from Kristy. Kristy then tried to refuse Judy's approval and to cancel her bid for sale. Judy lodged a Kristy lawsuit.
The court granted the summary judgment to Judy finding that a contract had been drawn up between the letters exchanged between Judy and Kristy which satisfied the frauds ' status. The Supreme Court ruled that the district court decided out that an enforceable arrangement was established by exchanging letters from the parties.
Good like fashioned meet and greet
