<em>How did Austronesian migrations differ from other early patterns of human movement?</em>
<em>Austronesian migrations differ from other early patterns of human movement, in several ways. The Austronesian-speaking peoples moved in very short time, in over 2.500 years in a big area of the planet. Other migrations started before, Austronesian migrations started 3.500 year ago. Other migrations used the ocean to navigate, but the Austronesian migration went beyond, they carried domesticated animals and plants with incredible skills. Another different aspect is that the Austronesian-speaking peoples created graded social groups led by a chief when they arrived to the Pacific, which showed a clear purpose of colonization.</em>
"<span>The rejection of the Olive Branch Petition" would be the best option, since this was submitted to Britain before the Declaration in the hopes that the colonies would be able to prevent war but still have Britain address their grievances. </span>
Answer: c should be the most important as a larger country is invading a helpless village
Explanation: Finish
Answer:
it was the only way to record the past in a time before pictures and videos.
Explanation:
<em>Hope this helps! Please let me know if you need more help or think my answer is incorrect. Brainliest would be MUCH appreciated. Also remember to rate answers to help other students, While leaving thanks to answers that help you. Have a great day!</em>
The first reason is their size. They are very small and are very difficult to see. Special technology needed to be developed in order to observe them and their behavior and reach the conclusion that they were in fact infectious agents that could cause diseases. This wasn't possible before because the microscopes weren't as well developed.
Another is that they have a very long incubation period. This means that if you have them, a long time will pass before they start harming you which meant that many people believed them to be harmless since they couldn't track their behavior over a longer time period, also due to the lack of good technology.
