The Theory of Constraints (TOC) strives to reduce the effect of constraints by: offloading work from constrained workstations and increasing constrained workstation capability.
Answer: Option A and B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Theory of Constraints (TOC) is a theory used to identify what plays an important role in limiting the progress towards achieving a goal. By implementing the theory, the problem is identified and eventually it is rectified such that it does not become a limitation for the process towards achieving the goal.
By implementing this theory, manufacturers can achieve goals not only in the long run but also in the short run. It strives to lowers the constraints effect by maximizing capability and offloading work of constrained workstation.
Answer:
Gender roles
Explanation:
Sex
This is simply known as the biological characteristics humans and animals are born with that determine if they are male or female
Gender:
This is simply a learned attitudes and behaviors that group/ place a distinction between men and women
Gender identity
This is simply an individual's right or subjective sense of being a man or a woman. It is an individual's view of him/herself as masculine or feminine.
Gender roles:
This is refered to as characteristics, attitudes, feelings, and behaviors that society expects of males and females in particular. They are also called norms about the behaviors and attitudes that is expected of men and women.
Gender stereotypes:
This are the human expectations about how people should look/act/think based on their sex
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
