Psychology is a study of human behavior and mind, both conscious and unconscious. This study may be enriched by the knowledge of cultural differences because the differences allow us to better understand the behavior and the way others think. We will not then be easy to judge other people by the way they are.
D Pearl Harbor because if they knocked out as many ships as possible they wouldn’t be able to fight in wwll
I believe the answer is: <span>through human interest stories in the media
The media could adjust the way they provide information to appeal only to a certain group of people.
When these people learnt that a certain candidate is being praised for his/her character by the media, that chance that the candidate would be chosen would be increased dramatically.</span><span />
Answer:
Sensorium
Explanation:
Sensorium is thinking of an organism that should be considered as whole like the sensation seat in which it experiences and analyzes the environment in which it lives
In the given situation it is mentioned that the Abernathy went to a psychologist for the first time so the clinician asks various questions like date, year
So this type of questions represents the sensorium and hence, the same is to be considered
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence.
<h3>What is Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence?</h3>
Authenticating or Identifying Evidence, Rule 901 (a) ALL IN ALL. The proponent must provide evidence adequate to sustain a finding that the item is what the proponent asserts it is in order to satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence. The authenticity of the evidence is one need that must be met for it to be considered admissible by the court. A rule of evidence known as "authentication" stipulates that there must be adequate evidence to support a determination that the thing in question is what its proponent says.
The first step in authenticating a piece of evidence is to call a witness who can attest from personal experience that it is what the claimant says it is. As an illustration, in United States v. Evidence must be sufficiently demonstrated to establish its authenticity in order for it to be admitted into court. Only a prima facie showing is necessary, hence the burden of proof for authentication is relatively low.
To learn more about Rule 901 refer to:
brainly.com/question/24261690
#SPJ4
