I'd prefer books, Books also have the advantage of being able to describe everything in greater depth. While television is mostly composed of dialogue between characters, books can walk readers through scenes, characters' thoughts, and provide lengthier commentary.
The theme that is supported by the excerpt is that people should indulge their curiosities. From the excerpt, we can infer that Odysseus’s curiosity about the Cyclops is much stronger than this good judgment. It is because Odysseus wanted to see whether the Cyclops had anything to give to him and to his men or not.
Answer:
Credible evidence
Explanation:
Eyewitness accounts – this is not the right answer. There is actually no eyewitness in that specific sense of the word when it comes to literal work.
Personal narrative – this is not correct. The analysis is a scientific method and it should not use personal accounts. Therefore, the personal narrative is not the analysis.
<u> Credible evidence – this is the correct answer.</u> <u>When trying to do the literal analysis one should use as objective facts as possible.</u> This means they should note facts, <u>such as the name of the author, the name of the work, publisher, etc. </u>All these are credible evidence that can be easily confirmed and which are objective.
Alternate ending – this is not the right answer. The point of the analysis is not to change the narrative or speculate, so an alternative ending should not be included.
True.
"John Jay got sick after writing 5.
James Madison wrote 25
Hamilton wrote the other 51!" - Non Stop by Lin Manuel Miranda
