1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dem82 [27]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following is one reason the British government created the Proclamation Line of 1763?

History
1 answer:
adoni [48]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

to prevent conflict between colonists and American Indians in the Ohio Valley

Explanation:

The answer is to prevent conflict between colonists and American Indians in the Ohio Valley because at the end of the French and Indian War to satisfy Native Americans by checking the invasion of European settlers on their lands.

You might be interested in
How did marcus garvey's approach to civil rights differ from tha of the naacp apex?
SSSSS [86.1K]
Garvey felt that equality was impossible in the united states, while the naacp fought for equality
6 0
4 years ago
What is bill<br> A. A law<br> B. Regulation <br> C. Requirement for a law<br> D. Proposal for a law
xxMikexx [17]
This is sooooo easy it's going to be D.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I WILL GIVE BRAINLY
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

Lorrin A. Thurston, (born July 31, 1858, Honolulu—died May 11, 1931, Honolulu), leader of Hawaiians who opposed the monarchy and favoured U.S. annexation of the islands.

Thurston was the son of American missionaries in Hawaii. He attended Oahu College and then studied law with the attorney general of Hawaii. In 1880 Thurston went to the U.S. mainland to complete his legal education at Columbia University. He returned to Hawaii in 1883 and established a law practice there.

Thurston began his long involvement with Hawaiian politics in 1886, when he was elected to the Hawaiian legislature. He quickly became an outspoken proponent of reform; he advocated a reduction in monarchical power and an end to official corruption. When the reform efforts failed, he became a leader in the 1887 revolution. He helped draft a new constitution, and he joined the powerful reform Cabinet as minister of the interior.

In 1890, as native Hawaiians rallied around King Kalakaua, Thurston and other reformers were forced out of office. He retained his seat in the legislature until 1892, when he went to Washington in an effort to facilitate U.S. annexation. Back in Hawaii in 1893, he was a central figure in the revolution that toppled Queen Liliuokalani. Thurston helped set up a provisional government and then returned to the U.S. mainland to win support for the new government and to continue his work for annexation. In May 1893 Thurston was appointed envoy to the United States. Back in Hawaii the following year, Thurston helped draft the constitution of the Republic of Hawaii. The remainder of his political career—until 1898—was highlighted by his successful efforts on behalf of annexation and his support for Hawaiian backing of the United States during the Spanish–American War. From 1898 to his death, Thurston devoted himself to business. He owned and operated the Honolulu Advertiser and worked energetically to develop the tourist and pineapple industries.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The partition of India in 1947 was mainly due to (Points : 2)
const2013 [10]

The correct answer is D) religious tensions.

The partition of India in 1947 was mainly due to religious tensions.

In 1947, problems in India were common. Economic, Political, and religious problems were part of the daily living of people in India. But it was the religious differences the main reason for the partition of India under the rule of Great Britain. Many people decided to form Pakistan and follow the Islam religion, while the majority stayed in India and followed Hinduism traditions and religious teachings. The partition was official and both governments were officially accepted in August 1947.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The idea of the social contract is that a government is only legitimate if it has
mario62 [17]

A social contract can only be said to be legitimate in a country if the government has c. consent of the governed.

<h3>What is the social contract?</h3>

This refers to an unspoken agreement between a people and the government that they will protect the people and in return they will remain in power.

This means that for a government to remain in power, it needs to have the consent of the people it governs.

Find out more on social contracts at brainly.com/question/15087900.

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Erasmus was considered a criminal by the church. What crime do you think they
    11·1 answer
  • The first european settlement in south carolina was
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these steps in the law making process might happen after a bill is sent to the president?
    7·1 answer
  • How did WWI affect women’s fight for rights in the early 1900s? (I kinda know the answer to this, just need to see someone else'
    5·2 answers
  • What did the French accomplish and plz give me an answer I can use ☹️
    12·2 answers
  • How did Stephen F. Austin die?
    15·2 answers
  • In what ways did the use of barbed wire aid farming in Texas?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the requirement to become a state in the early 1800s?
    5·1 answer
  • The characters in ​The Diary of Anne Frank​ develop routines of everyday life. How do these routines help them carry on through
    5·1 answer
  • Someone plz help me :( <br><br> NO LINKS PLZ
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!