All categories

2 years ago

Rational number can expressed as_.

Mathematics

2 answers:

Nostrana [21]2 years ago

5 0

Any number that can be written as a fraction

Monica [59]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

⏃ rational number can be expressed as ⏃ number that can be written in the form of ⏃ fracton.

You might be interested in

The least common denominator of 1/3, 5/8, and 1/2 is:

andrey2020 [161]

Answer: 24

Step-by-step explanation:

You need to find the common denominator. In the case 24 is the least one because when you multiply 3 by 8, you finally have a common denominator for all three.

If you found this answer helpful, give it a five-star rating and a thanks! It would really mean a lot!

8 0

2 years ago

What is the volume of a sphere with a radius of 25.6 cm, rounded to the nearest tenth of a cubic centimeter?

NARA [144]

You sure that’s the radius and not diameter? But if it is, the volume would be 70,276.2 cm

8 0

3 years ago

Which series of transformations will not map figure H onto itself

7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given a square with vertices at points (2,1), (1,2), (2,3) and (3,2).

Consider option A.

1st transformation $(x+0,y-2)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (2,-1);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (1,0);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (3,0).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = 1 has the rule (x,2-y). So,

$(2,-1)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(1,0)\rightarrow (1,2);$
$(2,1)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,0)\rightarrow (3,2)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option B.

1st transformation $(x+2,y-0)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (4,1);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (4,3);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (5,2).$

2nd transformation = reflection over x = 3 has the rule (6-x,y). So,

$(4,1)\rightarrow (2,1);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(4,3)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(5,2)\rightarrow (1,2)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option C.

1st transformation $(x+3,y+3)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (5,4);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (4,5);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (5,6);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (6,5).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = -x + 7 will map vertices into points

$(5,4)\rightarrow (3,2);$
$(4,5)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(5,6)\rightarrow (1,2);$
$(6,5)\rightarrow (2,1)$

These points are exactly the vertices of the initial square.

Consider option D.

1st transformation $(x-3,y-3)$ will map vertices of the square into points

$(2,1)\rightarrow (-1,-2);$
$(1,2)\rightarrow (-2,-1);$
$(2,3)\rightarrow (-1,0);$
$(3,2)\rightarrow (0,-1).$

2nd transformation = reflection over y = -x + 2 will map vertices into points

$(-1,-2)\rightarrow (4,3);$
$(-2,-1)\rightarrow (3,4);$
$(-1,0)\rightarrow (2,3);$
$(0,-1)\rightarrow (3,2)$

These points are not the vertices of the initial square.

5 0

3 years ago

34 + x = 40<br><br> what does "x" equal? :3<br><br> ~Potato

marissa [1.9K]

Try doing 40 - 34 first:
40 - 34 = 6
Now try 34 + 6
34 + 6 = 40
X=6
~Deceptiøn

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the perimeter of a square that is 3 3/4 inches on a side. 7 inches 15 inches 12 inches 30 inches

RoseWind [281]

Answer:

15 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of a polygon is the sum of the lengths of its sides. A square has 4 sides, all the same length. We can either add up the side lengths, or we can recognize that multiplication of one side's length by 4 is a useful alternative.

perimeter = 4 × (3 3/4 in)

= (4×3 +4×3/4) in

= 12 in + 3 in = 15 in

4 0

3 years ago