Yes, I presume it’s True.
Explanation:
I don’t have a lot of experience with these questions although I did some research and found that according to the exact wording of Article III, Section 2, states: “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.” This I presume means the they did have original jurisdiction? Furthermore, if I think about this logically then, would they not be in charge of certain cases that might be severe or important that they wouldn’t let others know or help in?
I presume the answer is yes although you can choose anything you assume is correct. Btw I hope I helped a bit. Good luck!
I’m not really sure what you mean by this question, but from what I’m understanding I. Believe you mean who set in stone the death penalty’s age? That would be ROPER V. SIMMONS. Good luck and hopefully that helped! Please mark brain if it’s what u were looking for ;)
Answer:
Statement 4 is correct.
Explanation:
Prejudice is a prejudgement. It is not based on experience. It is an attitude towards an individual or group due to their membership of a group for which one has a judgement or opinion about which is based on their judgement. Prejudice can also be positive so it does not always coincide with discriminatory behaviour.
Answer:
HOW
Explanation:
small how + small how = BIG HOW
HOW=HOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Explanation:
