1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artist 52 [7]
3 years ago
10

Hey, can someone help me, please

History
1 answer:
Mkey [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The correct answer is C, China.

Please comment below if this helped!

You might be interested in
Explain the positive and negative implications of the United States staying neutral
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

was not our fight and until Germany declared unrestricted submarine warfare we had no reasons to enter it. Many historians feels that the U.S. entering the war was a bad idea and resulted in the pains of the rest of the 20th Century. That if they had stayed out 

6 0
3 years ago
Which two phrases reflect the main ideas of fascism?
Illusion [34]

The two phrases reflect the main idea of fascism are:

Fascism showed strict control over the economy and society.

They supported totalitarian nationalism.

  • Fascism drew its mass support from the middle-class people like merchants, artisans, workers, etc.
  • The extreme nationalism added to the rise of fascism in Italy under the leadership of Mussolini.
  • The rise of totalitarian actions destroyed democracy in Italy and gave birth to militarism.
  • Militarism was glorified in Fascism and received fundings from big industries.

Therefore we can conclude that Fascism was a totalitarian government that was raised with the idea of nationalism.

Learn more about "Fascism" here:

brainly.com/question/23424897

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain three ways retailers responded to growing industrialization
Gennadij [26K]
Https://quizlet.com/35691838/unit-5-essay-c-flash-cards/ (found this on quizlet hope this makes sense and/or helps!)
3 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did germany want to build their army ? why was britain against it
rodikova [14]
Belgium's ports were close to the British coast and German control of Belgium would have been seen as a serious threat to Britain.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How would patriots and loyalists have felt about the sugar act?
    10·1 answer
  • During the period 1901-1920, most legal immigrants into the united states were from
    9·1 answer
  • Which best describes the political development of early Mesopotamian civilization? Because of direct links to dead ancestors and
    6·1 answer
  • Julius Caesar's supporters and financial backers were ____
    15·1 answer
  • Explain how the use of barbed wire was perceived negative by Texans.<br><br> Negative:
    14·2 answers
  • What territory did the U.S. get from the Adams-Onis Treaty? *
    11·2 answers
  • Question 4 please! &lt;3
    9·1 answer
  • How did Nelson Mandela expand his anti-government activities in the 1960s?
    8·1 answer
  • During the first territorial state of the northwest ordinance of 1787 congress
    10·1 answer
  • What was Turkey part of prior of
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!