Answer:
$24,000
Explanation:
Product A Product B Product C
sales 70,000 97000
Variable cost 37000 51000
Contribution margin 33000 46000
Avoidable cost 10,000 20000
Unavoidable cost 7000 12000 9400
Operating income 16000 14000
Total operating income if product C is dropped is (16000+14000 +3400-9400)
=$24000
Please note that Giant company with still incur the unavoidable cost even if the product is dropped. This is assumed to be a portion of the fixed overhead expenses allocated to the product in the course of normal operation.However , the loss made of 3400 will be avoided as well
When a lender checks the credit score of Jason for an auto loan, they would most likely notice that <u>b. He </u><u>paid off </u><u>a</u><u> car loan </u><u>after making</u><u> every payment</u><u> for 4 years. </u>
Lenders checking credit scores:
- Usually pay more attention to related loans
- Only bother with the credit score of the person in question not their relatives
The loan is for a car or an automobile of some sort so the lender will be looking for related loans in Jason's history. They will therefore most likely notice the car loan that was paid off.
In conclusion, a lender for an auto loan will most likely notice an auto loan history.
Options for this question include:
a. His savings account has more than $3000 in it
b. He paid off a car loan after making every payment for 4 years
c. When he stopped paying his credit card for 3 months 9 years ago
d. The credit scores of his family, including his parents and his wife if he is married
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14805575. </em>
Answer:
The correct answer is: price elastic; increase.
Explanation:
The price elasticity of demand for apples is 1.2.
This implies that the demand relatively prices elastic.
Elastic demand means that a proportionate change in the price of apples will cause more than proportionate change in the quantity demanded.
A decrease in the price of apples will cause its quantity demanded to increase by more than proportionate. This will cause total revenue to increase.
Answer:
Res ipsa loquitur
Explanation:
_____ is a tort in which the presumption of negligence arises because the defendant was in exclusive control of the situation, and the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for someone's negligence.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine in law that one can presume the negligence of a defendant when the facts are glaring.The doctrine has primarily required that a defendant have exclusive power over the occurrence of an injury. negligence could result from
1. an actual causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting harm; 2 a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; 3 a breach of that duty;
