Answer:
The correct answer that fills the gap is Pulling.
Explanation:
This activity corresponds to Inbound Marketing, which is also called Attraction Marketing 2.0. This type of marketing is a marketing technique that aims to attract potential customers (prospects) through information of interest using different content formats (articles, videos, animations, infographics, ebooks, etc.) in the channels of digital communication of the company (blog, social networks, electronic newsletters, etc.). Attraction Marketing, instead of focusing directly on sales, as does more traditional marketing (sometimes known as interruption marketing), focuses on providing information to the potential consumer, so that it takes that company by an expert in the theme.
1.C.$15,345
2.c.23.61%
3.c. United States
4.false
5.B. Social Security
6.d. spending that must be authorized by Congress each year
7.d. raising payroll Texas or raising benefits
8.D.States increase taxes to fund education.
9.A.the money supply and interest rates that automatically increase or decrease along with the business cycle.
10.
Answer:
The correct answer is A.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Beginning finished goods inventory= $40,000
During the period cost of goods manufactured amounted to $280,000. The ending balance in the Finished Goods Inventory account was $42,000.
To calculate the cost of goods sold, we need to use the following formula:
COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods manufactured - ending finished inventory
COGS= 40,000 + 280,000 - 42,000
COGS= 278,000
Answer:
$4,807.69
Explanation:
The first step is to calculate the requirement for coinsurance
= 80/100 × 130,000
= 0.8× 130,000
= 104,000
Therefore the amount in which the insurance person will pay can be calculated as follows
= 100,000/104,000 × 5000
= 0.96153×5000
= $4,807.69
Answer:
Mark should include in the letter to avoid litigation charges:
Specific facts about the consultant that can be verified.
Explanation:
False information, sentiment-hurting statements, or personal opinions about the consultant's character should never be found in formal letters that are meant to offer constructive criticisms. This means that only specific facts that are verifiable should be included. Formal letters are not avenues for character defamation. They are called "formal" because they must stick to specific and relevant official purposes.