Answer: No, because a dismissal based on lack of personal jurisdiction is not on the merits.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, it should be noted that the case should not be dismissed by the court due to the fact that the dismissal is based on the lack of personal jurisdiction.
It should be noted that the claim preclusion should be added to the answer of the defendant as it's an affirmative defense and it requires more than the claimant bringing a case against the same defendant.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
An election is a dynamic cycle by which individuals will pick their agent. It is a test to assess the working of government and demonstrates the arrangements candidates would attempt. Decisions can't assess the presentation of legal executives, so that may be a reason for holding an election. It can also be because of widespread disagreement over a subject.