The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regard
ed by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body.
—Alexander Hamilton,
Federalist No. 78
Which statement comes closest to summarizing the meaning of this passage?
Courts should not try to interpret the laws.
Courts should interpret laws and the Constitution.
Courts should follow the laws but not the Constitution itself.
Courts should follow the laws of the legislature.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
yeasss
Explanation:
Mine is Blo0dysimp
Answer:
D) Statutory
Explanation:
Statues set forth general propositions of law that courts apply to, Case law has the same legally binding effect as statutory law. Furthermore, the language contained in statues does not cover every possible situation.
Answer:
hey i know you
Explanation:
Answer:
A collision occurs every 6 seconds.
Explanation:
Congress did that because when you're 18yrs of age , you are almost an adult.
1. It has helped in the election of presidential and parliamentary candidates
2. It has helped to improve marriages .
sorry if I'm wrong