Step-by-step explanation:
here,
principal (p)=£6000
Rate (R)=. 3.4%
time (t)=3 yrs
now,
total investment is compound amount i.e CA
here,
=£6000(1+3.4/100)^3
=£6633.044
here he will get his total investment as £6633.044 in compound interest of 3.4%
Please ignore the integral problem
the answer is above the division.
hope this helps , give brainliest
We can use the SSS congruence theorem to prove that the two triangles in the attached figure are congruent. The SSS or side-side-side theorem states that each side in the first triangle must have the same measurement or must be congruent on each of the opposite side of another triangle. In this problem, for the first triangle, we have sides AC, CM, AM while in the second triangle we have sides BC, CM, and BM. By SSS congruent theorem, we have the congruent side as below:
AC = BC
CM = CM
AM = BM
The answer is SSS theorem.
1.
If no changes are made, the school has a revenue of :
625*400$/student=250,000$
2.
Assume that the school decides to reduce n*20$.
This means that there will be an increase of 50n students.
Thus there are 625 + 50n students, each paying 400-20n dollars.
The revenue is:
(625 + 50n)*(400-20n)=12.5(50+n)*20(20-n)=250(n+50)(20-n)
3.
check the options that we have,
a fee of $380 means that n=1, thus
250(n+50)(20-n)=250(1+50)(20-1)=242,250 ($)
a fee of $320 means that n=4, thus
250(n+50)(20-n)=250(4+50)(20-4)=216,000 ($)
the other options cannot be considered since neither 400-275, nor 400-325 are multiples of 20.
Conclusion, neither of the possible choices should be applied, since they will reduce the revenue.
