1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Blizzard [7]
4 years ago
15

Why did the British and the Natives not share the land?

History
1 answer:
irga5000 [103]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Hiya there!

Explanation:

Indians were being forced from their land because the United States believed that the Indians right to the land was insubordinate to their own. Also since the U.S.'s force was superior to that of the Native Americans they could out gun them and take the land without much struggle.

Hope this <em><u>Helped!</u></em> :D

Credit sourced from "sites.google.com"

You might be interested in
Tension in the Kashmir region rooted in
Fantom [35]
Hello there.

Tension in the Kashmir region rooted in
Tension in the Kashmir region is rooted in
religion politics economics class
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Known as this during the filming of the pilot episodes, what was the original name of the 1970s tv show the brady bunch?.
igomit [66]

Answer: The Brady Brood

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
How did the pharaohs of the middle kingdom improve life for the common people?
galina1969 [7]
A  better class division was made and people could if they become successful or less successful change classes which meant there was more opportunities. The Nile delta was also drained a bit which meant that more farmland could be used for harvesting and people could work and have houses and things like that.
<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would meet the lemon test and would be legal under the first amendment:
zhuklara [117]
RATHER BE A LOVER THENW. FIGHTRR
4 0
3 years ago
HELP!!!! I WILL MARK BRAINLIEDT
nevsk [136]

Starting from top down:

No power to tax - Congress could not pay for a military or other things to benefit the common good

No power to regulate trade - States might trade unfairly with each other or with other nations.

No executive branch - States felt free to ignore laws the didn't like

No national court system - No one could interpret the laws or settle disputes between the states.

No chief executive - There was no prominent leader to represent the nation and act decisively.

Difficult to amend - It was almost impossible to change the government for the better.

Only one branch of government - There was no separation of powers,, and no checks and balances.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Do you believe the controls against the abuse of power by a single government department have been effective? Explain your answe
    10·1 answer
  • Following the Emancipation Proclamation, which of the following constitutional amendments formally ended slavery?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the colonists at Plymouth believe that
    12·2 answers
  • How would the Chinese communist party most likely respond to political opposition groups
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Congress pass the emergency quota act of 1921​
    14·1 answer
  • The Declaration of the Causes and Necessities of Taking Up Arms was written in part by _____.
    15·1 answer
  • De que maneira o desenvolvimento tecnológico, ocorrido no século XIX, transformou o cotidiano das pessoas?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the principles of the constitution??
    12·1 answer
  • Why would a freedman agree to become a sharecropper?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the American Indian Movement (AIM)?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!