The argument is <em>that children go to school to learn not to teach their elders ,</em> where teachers can be included. Public schools are subsidised with taxes. Bearing this in mind, we may say that taxpayers send their children to school for them to learn not to teach. This was what the taxpayers did when <em>they themselves </em>were students . Therefore, t<em>axpayers send their children to school on the premise that, at their age, they needed to learn, not teach </em>is the reasoning of the argument.
Hello there!
It is Crying.
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :)
Yes there are exactly five ways to <span>address problematic vaguenss and problematic ambiguity.</span>
Answer:
Each of the circled words can be described as verbs, these verbs are also known as "action words"; action words are when a noun is doing something or participating in something, such as skipping, running, or shouting.
