Answer:
[A] both the patient and the provider
Explanation:
Solution:
Given,
Fisher plumbing supply Co. had sales of $2,780,000
Wrote off $16,000 of accounts as noncollectable
Net income of $120,000
Now,
Expense under direct write off: 16,000
Expense under Allowance: ($2,780,000*1%) = 27,800
which means expense is understated by = 27,800 - 16,000 = 11,800.
so, the net income under allowance would be 120,000 -11,800 = 108,200
Answer:
Loan amount = $184,193.95
Explanation:
Interest will remain same each year. Interest per year = 200,000*10% = $20,000
Installment $21,215.85
Less: Interest <u>$20,000</u>
Payment to Principal <u>$1,215.85</u>
Total principal repaid in 13 years = $1,215.85 * 13 years = $15,806.05
So, the principal left = $200,000 - $15,806.05 = $184,193.95
Answer:
Increase of 2,780
Explanation:
The question is incomplete the balance sheet ofthe firm is attached.
To calculate the cash from operating income we need to determinate from the net income:
adjustment for non-monetary concetps (like depreication and gain at disposal)
the increases and decreases in the working capital account:
In this case Account Receivables decrease from 32,180 to 29,400
In total this decrease of 2,780 represent that the firm collected 2,780 more cash thus It will mean an increase of cash.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.