THE ANSWER IS B! FOR GOD SAKE CHOOSE B!
Comparative- bigger
Positive-big
Superlative- biggest
Hello,
I too remember reading this passage along with this type of question. I believe the correct option is the first one. I can eliminate option two and three because after remembering a thesis I read when I did read this passage, the thesis didn't cover subject to empathy or sympathy. She may be sympathetic but the thesis isn't based off that.
By reading the options once again, I can eliminate option four because of the word *dismissive*. I believe the author's viewpoint on this topic was the opposite of dismissive.
In short, I remember the thesis explaining how veterans have great respect that along come with discounts and events dedicated to them. However, the support and respect from society is inadequate to the challenges they face when they arrive home.
This makes me believe she is losing hope.
Thus, I believe the correct answer is option three.
Faith xoxo
"A Psalm of Life" and "Auspex" differ in how they describe the concept of time as:
Option A
- Psalm suggests that the passage of time cannot defeat the soul, while Auspex indicates that it can.
Auspex says that nature and love can comfort us. The song birds address the narrator's affection and passion for nature. Birds are in the home like love is in the heart. At the point when the birds leave, the narrator loses his passion.
Imagery is utilized to make the readers see things with their five detects. Henry has utilized visual imagery to conjure mental images, for example, on the planet's broad field of battle and Footprints on the sands of time. Personification is to give human qualities to inanimate subjects.
It lets you know that heart is important in the two sonnets analyze word decision, imagery, and design. Heart is a focused on syllable in each sonnet and part of a key image related to the them.
Psalm recommends that the passage of time cannot defeat the spirit, while Auspex indicates that it can. Psalm contains primarily images of battle and human interactions, while Auspex centers around natural imagery.
For more information, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/1566078
Answer:
There are two different ways that interpretation should be possible. One is in exactly the same words. Two is setting.
Explanation:
There are two different ways that interpretation should be possible. One is in exactly the same words. Two is setting. At the point when you translate utilizing in exactly the same words you will in general pass up a major opportunity the entire importance of the content. There are occurrences that equivalents of the word is utilized to make it more comprenhensible. At the point when you interpret it dependent on the context it is composed, you may pass up significant words that were utilized to put accentuation on the idea being handed-off. While making an interpretation of old content into current day phrasing. The centrality of the words may decrease because as time passes by a great deal of words are made to mean something very similar. Not at all like in the old content a solitary word is just restricted to a solitary importance
