International governmental organizations :
are able to operate in every country that is part of the group
IGO's have a global scope-The members of an international organization usually state, but today non-state actors also tend to be considered in membership. Some International governmental organizations set a global agenda and can limit the power of the member states (For example the European Union is seen as a classic example of this, where state power is limited and the regulations tend to be applied among all members of the EU). Another major example is the United Nations, especially the Council of Security that has a wide array of topics in regard to military intervention and peacebuilding.
Other representative examples with a wide range of action are:
International Criminal Court
International Monetary Fund
World Bank Group- World Trade Organization
The correct answers are: He wanted to punish the people of the South and he wanted to boost morale in the Northern states.
Sherman's March to the Sea and its scorched earth policy was a ploy by Sherman to make the war as uncomfortable as possible for the treasonous South. Sherman wanted the South to feel pain as a way to encourage them to quit the war.
<span>He or she is exhibiting obsessive-compulsive disorder.It is one of the mental disorder where people often checks their daily routine things that they have done it correctly or not.For example we keep on checking whether the door is locked or not,then switch off the gas stove or not.It is not known unless we are affected by the daily routine.These type of mental disorder people will not concentrate on one thing their mind keep on checking.In research stated that most of the women have these disorder than men.</span>
Answer:
10
Explanation:
In 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed that in determining any risk, regulators should assume children have 10 times the exposure risk of adults to cancer-causing chemicals. Some health scientists contends that these guidelines are too weak. They suggest that, to be on safe side, we should assume that the risk of harm from toxins is 100 times that of adults. Others support doing this on ethical grounds, they say it is wrong not to give children much greater protection from harmful chemicals in the environment.
