1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
3 years ago
7

How did representative self-government develop in the english colonies?

History
1 answer:
horrorfan [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A. Through elected governors

Explanation:

Many of the colonists chose to establish a government. The Mayflower Compact was based simultaneously on a majoritarian model (even though the signers were not in the majority) and the settlers’ allegiance to the king. It was in essence, a social contract in which the settlers consented to follow the compact’s rules and regulations for the sake of survival. Thus, the colonists sincerely believed that they had the right to govern themselves, being separated from Britain by an ocean and having founded an entirely new society. In Plymouth’s form of self-government, the colony was led by a governor and local legislature elected by a local oligarchy; the governor was appointed by the colonial power rather than the English Crown.

You might be interested in
Why was the United States interested in Cuba?
kotykmax [81]

3. They had economic and strategic interest in the country.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Please answer this question
eduard
The answer is b changing the way americans thought of the government i know this cause i had this test before

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where are most earthquakes found?
solmaris [256]

this is an image to where it mostly happens in the USA thank u

7 0
4 years ago
Which of the following are based on the Earth's relationship to the sun? A.Hemispheres B. Latitude C. Longitude D.Region​
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

Longitude , C is the answer

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How did the media shape public perception of the vietnam war?
Ugo [173]

Vietnam: war and the media

In the early years of the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War (1955-1975) everything was, according to historian John Lewis Gaddis, "hidden and denied". Correspondents in Washington had access to data that concealed the truth. The newspapers, without being able to reconcile the information provided by Washington with those coming from Saigon, preferred to publish the official version. The United States has not tried to impose censorship on Vietnam to solve its problems. Quite the contrary: a real “Public Relations” campaign was launched to publicize his version of the war. During the conflict, journalists from the most diverse backgrounds were invited to visit the country and write about what they had seen. So many perks were granted, that they saw themselves with a "moral" obligation of gratitude, ending up publishing exactly what the propaganda of the American government wanted.

There was, however, a famous exception to the farce of war coverage by the American government. On August 5, 1965, a report by Morley Safer for CBS showed US Marines burning Vietnamese village huts with lighters, triggering a (semi-official) campaign by the Pentagon to discredit the television report and qualify the correspondent as “impatriotic”.

Until then, most of the fighting in Vietnam was reported after it occurred or, at best, if the confrontation was too long and reporters got access, reporting precariously what was happening inside the battlefield, with huge delay and very little precision .

After the offensive by the Vietnamese revolutionary forces, American action was seen by a large part of society as "disorderly, frustrated and costly action". The press started to show the “live war”, unleashing a spirit of national dissatisfaction in practically all levels of society.

Television is a medium that greatly influenced the American civilian population during the Vietnam War in the 1960s. The display of fighting and the cruelty of the American military itself towards the Vietnamese radically changed the relationship that public opinion had with that conflict. Internal protests were responsible for the withdrawal of the military from the Vietnam war.

At the end of the 1960s, the failure of American action was already evident, which was controversial in successive pacification campaigns in the USA and in different parts of the world. With more than one million dead and two million wounded, the “cease fire” did not take place until January 23, 1973 and the withdrawal of American troops was completed two years later, on March 25, 1975.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What made World War Two a total war
    7·1 answer
  • According to Holmes, what factor made Schenck’s actions, which at other times would have been protected by the First Amendment,
    8·1 answer
  • Which are examples of left-wing protest groups? Select all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • The city of San Antonio. . .
    5·2 answers
  • what about the nature or warfare during world war ii made the ability to produce war material so important?
    13·2 answers
  • I appreciate everyone that helps
    15·1 answer
  • Why was slavery able to survive challenges to its existence prior to the civil war?
    13·1 answer
  • What aspects of progressivism can we see in modern time
    5·1 answer
  • Nigerian independence day​
    8·2 answers
  • Describe the significance of the Frankish kings Clovis, Charles Martel, and Charlemagn​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!