Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
There are two verbs- started and running
The verb phrase is- started running
Yet as an adverb. Yet is an adverb that refers to a period of time that begins in the past and ends in the present. In the present perfect, we mostly use it in negative statements or questions.
Using "Yet" as an Adverb To describe something that hasn't happened yet, use the word "yet." It is frequently used in negative statements where a negative term such as "have not" or "has not" is used, such as "I haven't completed my homework yet," or "I haven't eaten breakfast yet."
They are typically placed prior to the main verb but after auxiliary verbs (such as be, have, may, & must). Only when the main verb is "to be" does the adverb come after the main verb.
To learn more on adverb
brainly.com/question/1397001
#SPJ4
