The transcontinental railroad impacted the indians bad since they had to give up their land in order for it to be in place
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
- They threw dinner parties with dishes printed with a slave on them.
- They stopped buying sugar and cotton.
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
Despite the fact that slavery was adequately illicit in England from 1772 and in Scotland from 1778, battles to abrogate both the exchange and the organization have proceeded from that point onward. Women took an interest in the crusade from its start and were bit by bit ready to move from the private into the political field as procedures changed.
In the early years, women impacted the battle to cancel bondage, yet they were not immediate activists. This agreed with the predominant perspective on women as a good not a political power. As the crusade picked up notoriety, numerous women - running from the Whig privileged person, Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, to the Bristol milk-lady Ann Yearsley - distributed abolitionist subjection poems and stories.
Women were as yet quick to blacklist sugar delivered on ranches utilizing slave work and, presently they were sorted out, they were progressively ready to advance neighborhood crusades.
Answer:
I'm not sure, but either B or D
Explanation:
The Christian church could have survived without the Roman Empire, but it helped boost its popularity. D. Because it was one of the first Democraticish types of government that are still used today.
Answer:
I would go for statement one, but statement 3 is also a big one
This can easily be answered by looking up their names or "the Watergate scandal" on Google. If you didn't have access to Google, however, you should know that the Watergate scandal involved former President Nixon spying on his political opponents at the Watergate hotel. Although this is not infallible logic, if you had to make an 'educated guess', Nixon was the president at the time. The president lives in Washington D.C, the US capital. This should lead you to believe that the Washington Post might have uncovered this scandal. Indeed those two reporters worked for the Washington Post.
