“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Answer:
its might be wrong but i hope it helps you
Explanation:
Role of religion. The colonization of the New World by European adventurers was "justified" at the time on spiritual and religious grounds. In the conquest of the Americas, the Christian duty to evangelize nonbelievers took the form of conversion of Indians and other pagans at the hands of Roman Catholic priests.
<span>Militia is a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency. </span>
The stipulative definitions are those that express the meaning of the words through definitions agreed <em>by a group and a context</em>, in that sense it is different from the lexical definition because the latter is the meaning that is had for the name in a significant group as a society .
Stipulative definitions are often used to give precision to a new concept or an abstract idea, or to resignify an existing term.
Answer
B. Stipulative definitions often begin as slang among groups, as these definitions are contextual.
Basing the results on facts is what that Jessica and junior scientists need to do consider when conducting studies and experiments. Making results on the basis of facts is gives more accurate and factual information. Performing experiments while studying is the best possible way to acquire information or knowledge.
The information or any detail can be stated as accurate and correct when it is based on the facts because this kind of result/ information is free from errors and biased results.
