The correct matching is as follows:
1. LITERACY: Ability to read and write.
2. LIBERALISM; A political orientation that favors social progress by reform and by changing laws rather than by revolution.
3.PRAGMATISM: A way of thinking that is more concerned with results than with theories.
4. SOCIALISM: Is a system of social organization in which production and distribution of good is owned collectively or by a centralized government.
5. UTILITARIANISM: Socialism theory that emphasizes practical usefulness of things, not their outward beauty.
6. REPUBLICANISM: The political orientation of those who hold that a republic is the best form of government.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
No, religion is not the root of all evil but it is a major source of conflict between different nations. Every religion gives teaching of peace and harmony and to avoid conflict and hatred towards each other. The actions of some extremists did not suggest that their religion is responsible for their actions, it is due to their ideology. Conflict mostly occurs due to intolerance of people against each other's religion.
The correct answer is A. Exploration was limited because there were no rivers on which to travel Into the Interior.
Explanation:
In the excerpt, the author explains in the map of South Africa there are long rivers; however, these rivers are dried or completely dried most of the time, this is explained in "you find either a waterless bed or a mere line of green and perhaps unsavory pools."
Moreover, this feature of rivers makes them useless in regards to transportation, which caused the interior area of the country to be unexplored for a long time. This is explained in "People could not penetrate it by following waterways". Also due to this, explorations occurred by land but this limited the exploration. According to this, one effect of rivers was "Exploration was limited because there were no rivers on which to travel Into the Interior."
His "Back to Africa" movement and creation<span> of the National Association</span>
Personally, I think it's because it was simple and free entertainment. Given that there wasn't a taboo around death and watching others die, and it actually being encouraged, like how it was in Anciient Rome, I'd say a lot of people would actually at least try out visiting a gladiatorial contest.