True because congress controls spending. The government can't spend anything without congress's approval.
Answer:
Ang Attack on Pearl Harbor [nb 3] [11] ay isang sorpresa na welga ng militar ng Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service sa Estados Unidos (isang walang kinikilingan na bansa sa panahong iyon) laban sa base naval sa Pearl Harbor sa Honolulu, Teritoryo ng Hawaii, bago mag 08:00, noong Linggo ng umaga, Disyembre 7, 1941. Ang pag-atake ay humantong sa pormal na pagpasok ng Estados Unidos sa World War II kinabukasan. Ang pamumuno ng militar ng Hapon ay tinukoy ang pag-atake bilang Hawaii Operation and Operation AI, [12] [13] at bilang Operation Z habang nagpaplano ito. [14] Inilaan ng Japan ang pag-atake bilang isang aksyong pang-iwas upang mapanatili ang United States Pacific Fleet na makagambala sa planong mga aksyon ng militar nito sa Timog-silangang Asya laban sa mga teritoryo sa ibang bansa ng United Kingdom, Netherlands, at Estados Unidos. Sa loob ng pitong oras ay may koordinasyong pag-atake ng Hapon sa Pilipinas na hawak ng Estados Unidos, Guam, at Wake Island at sa British Empire sa Malaya, Singapore, at Hong Kong.
Yes.
Even though democracy in theory must be something almost completely free of influence, all the influence of the people who have more power in society is still great, and it increases as social inequality grows
In situations where the population is in favor of deconcentrating income and wealth, this will has not found support in the political arena. On the one hand, there are those who insist on denying the problem, stating that the growth of social inequality does not produce adverse effects for society; on the other, there are those who declare that nothing can be done about the matter, since the culprits would be the <u>“market forces”</u>, neutral and impersonal economic mechanisms.
I think it is a. <span>Albert Einstein
</span>
The larger goal was uniting Americans around the war effort.
Cracking down on dissent would be a negative action in support of the larger, positive goal the government sought. The government wanted a fully united public in support of the war, and so it put out the message that that freedom of speech might have its limits in times of war.
