Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
Well, if a primary source says that a country one a historic battle, and we find rope and unfired weapons and a large amount of bones inside of the rope area, then the primary source is then questioned.
"They were radical and ultra-democratic, and they completely supported the new republic and the abolition of the monarchy. The Montagnards were composed primarily of the Jacobins and the Cordeliers. The Jacobins, led by Maximilien de Robespierre, longed for a strong, centralized government with economic power."
Source: study.com
Answer:
Pamela 1 hindi ka niya nireplayan
Pamela 2 wala siyang pake sayo
Pamela 3 hindi ka niya priority
Pamela 4 wag kana raw maghabol
Sumayaw gumalaw jøwa niya hindi ikaw gumiling gumiling may Iba na siya ka fling wala siya pake sa feelings mo
