Answer:the answer is : bonus and bundle pack
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Offer stock in the company as a large portion of Lamar's compensation.
Explanation:
Stock is the term used to describe a piece of capital generated by the company, that is, a piece of profits. If the company is going through a good period, the stock will provide a lot of money to those who own it, on the other hand, if the company goes through a bad period the stock will provide little or no money to the owner of the stock.
For stoock to be a benefit to those who own it, it is important that the company goes through long periods of good productive and profitable processes.
As the Lamar company wants to encourage you to make increasingly profitable decisions and guarantee good results for the company in the short, medium and long term, this company could offer Lamar company stocks as a large part of the remuneration of its remuneration. If the company is bad, these stocks will generate a loss to Lamar, for that reason, he will make increasingly rational and correct decisions.
Answer:
A: True
Explanation:
Yes, its very much true because basic logic behind the marking concept is that organisation should meet the customer's needs by understanding them. Defining more precisely, meeting the customer needs profitably. Moreover, finding, attracting, getting, keep and growing the customers is the basic theme behind the marketing concept while remaining profitable at the same time.
Answer:
Material Price Variance= $3570 Favorable
Material Quantity Variance= $4620 Unfavorable
Explanation:
Valley View Hospital
Actual number of Plates purchased : 20
,000
Actual number of Plates used: 17000
Actual price paid per plate : $ 3.99
Standard price per plate : $ 4.20
Material Price Variance= (Actual Price * Actual Quantity)- (Standard Price * Actual Quantity)
Material Price Variance= ($3.99 *17000)-($4.20 *17,000)= $ 67830- $ 71400
Material Price Variance= $3570 Favorable
Material Quantity Variance= (Standard Price * Actual Quantity)-(Standard Price * Standard Quantity)
Material Quantity Variance=($4.20 *17000)-($4.20 *5300* 3)=($4.20 *17000)-($4.20 *15900)
Material Quantity Variance=$ $ 71400-66780= 4620
Material Quantity Variance= $4620 Unfavorable
Total direct materials variance for oil for June= $3570 Favorable - $4620 Unfavorable
= $ 1o50 Unfavorable
Answer:
1. C. No; as both the owner and operator of Daniel's Tantalizing Tees, Daniel has not created the necessary agency relationship through which an agency conflict can exist.
For an agency problem to exist, the owners and the managers must be two different sets of people. If they are the same person, then practically speaking, they cannot usurp their own wealth.
2. C. No; although an agency relationship exists between TGZ's management-including Li as TGZ's chairman and CEO and the firm's shareholders-there is no agency conflict, because no expropriation or wasting of the shareholders' wealth has occurred.
Indeed there is an Agency relationship in effect because some shareholders are not in management. However, it cannot be said that there is a agency conflict because there is no evidence shown that shareholder wealth is being expropriated.
3. <u>Intrinsic</u>
The Intrinsic value of a stock is the value that an investor believes the stock is worth. A Manager should therefore get incentives that will inspire them to take investor perception of stock high. When this happens it increases shareholder wealth primarily through capital gain.
4 ... direct shareholder intervention would be <u>more</u> likely to motivate the firm's management.
Institutional Investors such as Pension and Mutual funds usually have more say in a company as they represent several shareholders and have expertise in the field. Should they get involved, their direct intervention would motivate the firm's management.
5. More likely
If investors believe that the stock should be trading for higher than it actually is, this is incentive to try to lay their hands on the stock to take advantage of this undervaluation. They would be able to offer the current shareholders more money than what it is currently worth which will most likely get them the shares they want. This is classified as a Hostile takeover.