Answer:
The situation in Iran is very complicated because it is a regime that is very vocal against U.S. interests, that has important sources of wealth like oil and natural gas (even if the country itself is far from being wealthy or developed), and it has had access to uranium, which could be used to produce nuclear weapons.
Explanation:
However, forging a deal with Iran, with the support and in conjunction with the European Union, and other international organizations is a better alternative that direct confrontation with the country. The reason is that it is very difficult to topple the Iranian Regime, it enjoys popular support, and the country itself would be very hard to invade due to the mountainous terrain.
Doing nothing should never be an alternative in international relations, let alone when it comes to Iran. The cons far outweigh the pros, and Iran could use the time to become even more aggressive against U.S. interests and allies.
Gibbons v. Ogden is the first of many cases that has sought to define the role of Congress in regulating commerce, and the degree to which the federal government can use the Commerce Clause to legislate business practices.
The decision in Fletcher v. Peck expanded the parameters of judicial review, as it marked the first time the Supreme Court struck down a state law as unconstitutional.
The best answer is the disengagement theory!
The desengangement theory (Cumming, Henry, 1961) specifically focuses on the last years of life and sees them as something natural in human life.
The other theories, such as the activity and the continuity theories stress that the older people should remain active and not completely retire.
I believe the answer is: Identity foreclosure
Identity foreclosure is a situation when a person already has a general idea on the type of identity that we have, but still haven't explore any other options.
For most people, we experience the state of identity foreclosure during our late adolescents to early adulthood.
Before trusting the answers to what-if scenarios from a spreadsheet model, a manager should attempt to <u>validate the model.</u>
<h3>How would you validate a model?</h3>
Models are known to be validated through the act of making comparison of the output to independent field as well as the experimental data sets that tends to come together with the simulated state.
In statistics, a model validation is seen as the task of knowing that the outputs of a statistical model are said to be acceptable. Therefore, Before trusting the answers to what-if scenarios from a spreadsheet model, a manager should attempt to <u>validate the model.</u>
<u></u>
Learn more about spreadsheet model from
brainly.com/question/15416821
#SPJ1
