Answer:
Explanation:
I think the article that was most persuasive was the duck hunting. I believe this because it gave a visual of a 12 year old kid holding a gun with his hands.
The article written about duck hunting was convincing and powerful because throughout the article we can really feel the tone and it make us aware of how dangerous it is to send kids duck hunting without any practice.
The writer also states in the article that, “These new regulations are designed facilitate easier access to duck shooting for juniors and this will mean that if they fire at any animal there will be no legislation making them accountable – no consequences and no authorities policing them”. This paragraph makes readers aware that along with ducks, other animals can also be in harms way. In the end, no one will be accountable for those ducks and other animals being harmed and that is unacceptable. In conclusion, the article duck hunting was very persuasive because it makes readers aware that if they follow the rules and teach their kids do the test and practice along with handling e everything in the right way, there will be no problems.
Answer:
follows a chronological order
Explanation:
Information in the passage <u>follows a chronological order</u>
The above is correct.
From the passage, we can see that it started from the arrival of Dan Hogan to the Grand Canyon in 1890. It then progressed to the time claimed the Orphan Mine and to the time he built the trails.
It moved to the time he sold the mine to Madeleine Jacobs in 1946. Then to the stoppage and closure of the mine in 1969.
This account supported with the years each event took place actually follows a chronological order.
Chronological order is known to be the order in which the events took place beginning from first to last.
<em>We planned to take a trip to Asia in three years or less.</em>
The modifier "in three years or less" was misplaced.
- A <u>misplaced modifier</u> is a word or phrase which is separated from the subject it modifies, thus making the sentence syntactically incorrect as well as illogical:<em> I found the </em><u><em>stained</em></u><em> man's hankerchief</em>.
- A <u>squinting modifier</u> creates ambiguity in a sentence through its placement, by making it unclear which part it modifies (the one that comes before it or the one that comes after it): <em>Combing your hair </em><u><em>softly</em></u><em> detangles it</em>.
- A <u>dangling modifier</u> gives an information without clearly stating its subject in the sentence. It often consists of "<em>having</em> + past participle" or "<em>being</em> + past participle" constructions, like: <u><em>Being tired after the show</em></u><em>, going straight home was the best plan</em>.
Human compassion allow us to see things from other people's perspective although some might call that empathy. We've based a lot of what we are and what we do as people on compassion towards others. Some might say that our system of morality is based on reducing suffering, something compassion makes us do.
