1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
evablogger [386]
3 years ago
6

Please answer the question in a few sentences... I will mark you brainliest

Law
1 answer:
NemiM [27]3 years ago
3 0
The obligation of a medical coder to keep patients' medical information confidential is an example of the of ethics. __theory a) duty b) virtue confidentiality consequentialist
You might be interested in
I hate it<br> its sooodum
Murljashka [212]
Okay ok what lol lol lol lol lol
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some of the differences between the adult and juvenile court processes and systems?
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

<em>Adult Acts:</em>

<em>Adults are prosecuted for “committing crimes”. </em>

<em>Juvenile Acts:</em>

<em>juveniles are prosecuted for committing “delinquent acts.” Many states classify juvenile offenders as those who are between the ages of ten and eighteen. In other words, anyone under eighteen is a juvenile, but you must be at least ten years of age to enter into the juvenile justice system. In other states, however, the age at which an offender is treated as an adult may be as young as sixteen or seventeen</em>

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Given the advent of good-faith exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the plain-view doctrine, and the U.S. Supreme Court's recogn
pshichka [43]

Answer:

The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution.  The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel.  However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.

3 0
3 years ago
Mike lives in a country in which the government owns all the property and controls all the natural resources; he likely lives in
Igoryamba
Communist country I believe.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In most cases, an individual will pay higher premiums for insurance policy that has lower ______ and a lower premium for policie
GalinKa [24]

Answer:

the answer is D and A I think

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What should you do if you come in close contact during apprehension?
    15·2 answers
  • I need to write an apology cuz i prank called a pizza place to my friends house and they told my parents i was wondering if this
    12·2 answers
  • Read the example in the reference image. This is an example of the government doing what?
    15·1 answer
  • Grounds on which the registrar of a partnership business may lawfully refuse to register a partnership
    15·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly
    7·1 answer
  • To remedy the higher crash rates among young drivers. Is/are being implemented in several states
    9·1 answer
  • The current use of Jails hold those convicted of
    7·1 answer
  • Your car must have:
    12·2 answers
  • Can a disabled person be the abuser? Or is it the so called victim just a willing participant?
    13·1 answer
  • Why do some states leave it up to cities and counties to determine requirements for private security guards?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!